Just because you sound acerbic, doesn’t mean your words aren’t kind. Don’t tell them to ‘ask nicely’. A tone argument is an argument used in discussions, sometimes by concern trolls and sometimes as a derailment tactic, where it is suggested that feminists would be more successful if only they expressed themselves in a more pleasant tone. This is also sometimes described as catching more flies with honey than with vinegar , a particular variant of the tone argument. The tone argument also manifests itself where arguments produced in an angry tone are dismissed irrespective of the legitimacy of the argument; this is also known as tone policing. The tone argument is a form of derailment, or a red herring, because the tone of a statement is independent of the content of the statement in question, and calling attention to it distracts from the issues raised. Drawing attention to the tone rather than content of a statement can allow other parties to avoid engaging with sound arguments presented in that statement, thus undermining the original party’s attempt to communicate and effectively shutting them down. Tone arguments are also often entwined with privilege , especially when a member of a oppressor group oftentimes in a position of power abuses said power to shut down concerns raised by a marginalized group, irrespective of whether the concerns are valid through invoking the tone argument. This is especially true when the marginalized is a newcomer to the discussion and is afterward ostracized by the groupthink when their tone differs from those preferred by the group. The tone argument is also used as a silencing tactic, where someone invariably becomes angry due to their opponent often in a position of power dismissed or ignores their repeated requests or well-reasoned arguments, and said anger is then used to justify removing them from the discussion, thereby silencing them.
5 logical fallacies that make you more wrong than you think
This article has been reproduced in a new format and may be missing content or contain faulty links. Contact wiredlabs wired. There are always 24 hours in a day. Months have either 30 or 31 days.
It goes like this “You shouldn’t pick Susan to be on our basketball team because she’s a computer geek.” This fallacy aims at saying something distasteful about a.
I have been a geek and loved geeks since I began having relationships outside my family, and I have to say that The 5 Geek Social Fallacies rang true to me in that particular self-recognition-wince way. Geeks have relationships and the particular pitfalls for my logical, overthinking ilk deserve mention. Now, remember folks! The person who is having emotions outside those that are expected is weak and the loser and — worst of all — wrong.
Wanting to make a change in the relationship means the relationship is flawed, and therefore unsustainable. Changes in a relationship starting to date or breaking up will disrupt the surrounding friend group. You both have to love everything in the same way with the same intensity. The rest of the fallacies have a root in this one because this fallacy is at the root of a lot of geek behavior.
Logic is our friend! Processes are our friends! Not always, and usually not when feelings are at stake.
Tech’s Damaging Myth of the Loner Genius Nerd
When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. This resource covers using logic within writing—logical vocabulary, logical fallacies, and other types of logos-based reasoning.
Join the GeekWire membership program and support independent submarines which to date haven’t had any publicly-known accidents. Also, that is a logical fallacy about Bill Gates being able to “afford this technology”.
Dear Captain, I’ve looked in the archives for something like this, but I couldn’t find anything. What do you do when you apologize and it seems to upset someone even more? Dear Captain, I looked through the archives and I couldn’t see anything on this particular topic, but apologies if I missed something. It does seem connected to the Geek Social Fallacies though. My question is about how to deal with awkwardness and anxieties over the dreaded Group Chat.
His preferred mode of communication is texting and he frequently tries to have long, involved text conversations with me.
Let’s face it, sometimes we get tired of dating models. Sure, they clean up well but it gets annoying having to tell her she’s beautiful a hundred times a day and the cocaine bill gets expensive. You might think you have no hope of getting an attractive low-maintenance geek girl and I am inclined to agree that you can’t anyway but I would rather light a candle than curse your darkness, so here are my tips to try and help.
High quality Logical Fallacy gifts and merchandise. Inspired designs on t-shirts, posters, stickers, home decor, and more by independent artists and designers.
You are not in control of your thoughts. If it piques your interest, you can read the full book for more details. In general, this tendency is helpful, as it allows us to live our lives without having to agonize over every little decision in our day. As logical as you think you are, your brain deals better with intuition than logic, better with generalizations than statistics. Before I get into the specific biases and fallacies, I should explain how Kahneman views human thought. Your mind prefers to take the path of least resistance, the less deliberate thought the better.
While no means exhaustive, the following are six common cognitive biases or fallacies to watch out for in your studies, work, and personal life. The best way to avoid the halo effect is to rely on objective measures of competency as much as possible. Marketers exploit this tendency all the time. Logically, these statements are equivalent, but people are not intuitively logical. Use the framing effect to advance your goals, or haplessly allow others to influence your actions through it: the choice is yours.
The availability bias is a phenomenon in which are judgments are biased by how easily you can call examples to mind it is ease, not the number of examples, that matters.
The Internet has introduced a golden age of ill-informed arguments. Unfortunately, the very wiring of our brains ensures that all these lively debates only make us dumber and more narrow-minded. Here are excerpts describing the 5 fallacies, with some commentary from me re some examples from the climate debate:. Think about the last time you ran into a coworker or family member spouting some easily disproven conspiracy theory.
As for fallacies, I’ll let Kahneman explain: ”The word fallacy is used, in general, when people fail to apply a logical rule that is obviously relevant” .
In this article we are taking the perspective of an institutional investor who wants to invest in one or several commodity trading advisor funds CTAs. Meetings we have had with investors over the last decade indicate that they do an initial quantitative screening, but then — after having met with the different CTA managers — put a lower weight on the hard facts realised track record and a higher weight on soft factors all other kinds of information when they make their final investment decision.
The Pitch Book Fallacy 2. The Slick Presenter Fallacy 3. The Big Team Fallacy 4. The Title Fallacy 5. The Long Experience Fallacy 6. The Brand Fallacy 7. The Technology Fallacy 8. The Trading Fallacy 9. The Transparency Fallacy The Performance Fallacy.
NERD MISFIT RESOURCES
It must be said, once you undergo some of these Russian dating web sites, the ladies are almost impossibly beautiful. However in the go date now overwhelming majority of cases, the pictures do represent actuality. The very fact is for many future Russian brides or Ukrainian brides, what you appear to be does not matter to them, as much as you might think it does. They are far more involved within the qualities which I wrote about above.
One thing to keep in mind is that dating is at its core a numbers sport. This, sadly, is just part of how dating works; to cite fellow recommendation columnist and NerdLove Superstar Patronus Dan Savage: each relationship fails till one does not.
Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading Geek pages; Publisher: PublicAffairs (May 26, ); Publication Date: May 26, In essence, he dismantles the fallacy of technology as a one-stop shop for.
I tell myself that the fight is over and no one won. I rationalize that only a few people are ruining it for the rest of us and therefore, those few should just be ignored. We do! So why does it keep getting dragged into our dialogue? And if we are accused of fakedom , why do we snap back in defense? Why so much power? Why are we so deeply threatened by the notion of falsified fandom?
I wish it were that simple. This stronger reaction stems from years of repeated, accumulated experiences of insults, indignities, and demeaning messages from other members of the comics community. These experiences—the seemingly harmless comments, the sarcastic jokes, the subtle non-physical exchanges—are called microaggressions. Here are some examples of gender microaggressions in the context of female members of the comics community:.
Women also deliver these seemingly harmless bites. Why are microaggressions harmful?
T-shirts, stickers, wall art, home decor, and more featuring designs by independent artists. Find Logical Fallacy gifts and merchandise printed on quality products that are produced one at a time in socially responsible ways. Sell your art.
Missing stair is a metaphor for a person within a social group who many people know is Geek culture site The Mary Sue referenced the concept in , in a story celebrating science fiction writer John “# The Geek Social Fallacy Host – Missing Stair Guest Relationship”. “Help! My Friend is Dating a Creepy Dude”.
Download the full article: The Tea Fallacy. Shock and awe don’t leave much room for empathy. The doctrine, technically known as “rapid dominance” may have devastated the military capability of Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq in short order, but America’s failure to win the peace in either Iraq or Afghanistan with overwhelming military force has galvanized a profound re-thinking of the concept of war, the process of peace, and the challenges of failing states.
This is evident in national strategies, doctrines, policies, manuals and the quadrennial defense review, as well as countless other official and unofficial statements, both military and civilian. Reflection on such a scale on so many levels and across such a broad range of disciplines and agencies is rare and impressive. The output has been dramatic, the implied self-criticism penetrating, and the insights promising, but there is a potentially a profound misunderstanding at the heart of much of this that could result in failure, defeat, and death.
The central epiphany of the new thinking is the recognition that the object of war, at least of the kind of wars that have been prevalent in recent decades, is the people.